The “No” vote triumphs in the referendum, as the opposition celebrates

User Avatar

UCapital Media

Share:

Following the outcome of the justice reform referendum, which saw the “No” side prevail with just over 53% of the vote, there is a sense of disappointment within the center-right, accompanied by a clear determination to continue pursuing institutional reforms.


The government led by Giorgia Meloni, while recognizing the result expressed by voters, stressed that the vote should not be interpreted as a judgment on the administration itself, but rather as a decision on a complex and divisive reform. This distinction had been emphasized throughout the campaign, during which the government encouraged voters to assess the substance of the proposals without turning the referendum into a political verdict.


Within the ruling coalition, some disappointment is evident, particularly because the reform aimed to introduce changes considered by many to be necessary to make the judicial system more efficient and transparent. Key elements included the separation of careers between judges and prosecutors, as well as a revision of the High Council of the Judiciary, measures that the government still views as relevant in the broader effort to modernize the country.


Despite this setback, the executive has reaffirmed the strength of its majority and its intention to move forward with its program. The stated goal remains to address the shortcomings of the justice system through alternative measures or new parliamentary initiatives, in line with the message conveyed by voters.


In this context, the vote is also seen as a sign of the issue’s complexity and the need for broader, more in-depth public discussion. The significant turnout confirms citizens’ strong interest in justice reform, widely regarded as a key priority for the country’s future.


The center-right, therefore, while acknowledging the defeat, is not stepping back from its reform agenda and instead is relaunching its efforts, convinced that meaningful change requires time and a more extensive dialogue with the public.


Klevis Gjoka