Harris fights wage war with Trump over her backing a $15 minimum wage
Press Hub UCapital
Share:
In brief, Vice President Kamala Harris has joined the hot debate and stated her support to the $15 minimum wage, which leads to a confrontation against Donald Trump on the issue of salaries. They are both on the go for 2024 presidential elections, so much as I can anticipate the high demanding area of wage growth and workers rights have come to the picture highlighting a bigger gap in expectations among the candidates.
For Harris, wage and notion of increasing the minimum wage is more than just an economic drive, but is also a progressive tool towards addressing social inequities especially in the U.S. that would help more individuals move from poverty. Also, since the working class is more hit by inflation and increased standards of living, her proposal intends to guarantee that wages are in line with the economic situation. Conversely, Trump believes that an increase in the minimum wage enforced by law may do more harm to small enterprises thereby inhibiting employment especially in the countryside with its difficulties in meeting the monetary standards provided.
On the other hand, those who are against such a move, including even the most influential conservative economists, believe that such a drastic increase of the minimum wage will result in many downsides such that most small businesses would be forced to retrench workers or would effect high costs which they would pass over to their customers. Certain industries particularly such as retail and accommodation that rely substantially on employees earning the bare minimum could toil in a debt. Trump’s other way out suggests low tax and minimum regulation on businesses as it is the economic competition that allows for growth of the economy by encouraging employment and driving up wages through the market.
Desire of Harris aimed to implement the minimum wage increase as high as $15 also has an element of discontent as some people have reached extremely low levels of income, to the extend that the current minimum wage rate set for the federal government, which is $7.25 is unfruitful since it was last changed some ten years ago in 2009. On the other hand, Transitional has its overall philosophy of wage regulation within the U.S highly ethnically, suggesting that different states should exercise their right to set the minimum wages depending on the state’s specific economic situation. This regional approach, he argues, provides for less rigid bill for businesses and more sensitivity to the cost of living of the people in the region.
Harris fights wage war with Trump over her backing a $15 minimum wage
The wage increase has now become more pronounced in the pre 2024 election campaign between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The current vice president, Dr. Kamala Devi Harris, has announced her backing for raising the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, singling it out as an important aspect of her economic agenda. This is a sharp break from the stance taken by Trump, as he is strongly against wage increases and is more inclined to free markets. They are having a wage standoff, but this really just serves to highlight two different ideas of wheres the country and its workforce should be in future.For Harris, wage and notion of increasing the minimum wage is more than just an economic drive, but is also a progressive tool towards addressing social inequities especially in the U.S. that would help more individuals move from poverty. Also, since the working class is more hit by inflation and increased standards of living, her proposal intends to guarantee that wages are in line with the economic situation. Conversely, Trump believes that an increase in the minimum wage enforced by law may do more harm to small enterprises thereby inhibiting employment especially in the countryside with its difficulties in meeting the monetary standards provided.
Economic implications of minimum wage policy conflict
The disquisition on minimum wages is not only numerical, but also related to the consequences of different economic approaches of on both businesses and employees. Pro minimum wage analyst like Harris has suggested - raising the wages will boost the economy since the poor workers will have more money to spend which will increase the consumption of products and services. It is this argument that asserts that the positive economic activities during those periods would support the growth of new firms and the creation of additional jobs as well.On the other hand, those who are against such a move, including even the most influential conservative economists, believe that such a drastic increase of the minimum wage will result in many downsides such that most small businesses would be forced to retrench workers or would effect high costs which they would pass over to their customers. Certain industries particularly such as retail and accommodation that rely substantially on employees earning the bare minimum could toil in a debt. Trump’s other way out suggests low tax and minimum regulation on businesses as it is the economic competition that allows for growth of the economy by encouraging employment and driving up wages through the market.
Desire of Harris aimed to implement the minimum wage increase as high as $15 also has an element of discontent as some people have reached extremely low levels of income, to the extend that the current minimum wage rate set for the federal government, which is $7.25 is unfruitful since it was last changed some ten years ago in 2009. On the other hand, Transitional has its overall philosophy of wage regulation within the U.S highly ethnically, suggesting that different states should exercise their right to set the minimum wages depending on the state’s specific economic situation. This regional approach, he argues, provides for less rigid bill for businesses and more sensitivity to the cost of living of the people in the region.