Judge Blocks $8.5B Tapestry-Capri Merger: Luxury Market Impact
Press Hub UCapital
Share:
The luxury goods market saw a seismic shift on Friday as Capri Holdings' stock plummeted by 45% following a federal judge’s decision to halt its merger with Tapestry, the parent company of Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman. In contrast, Tapestry’s stock climbed by 10% after the ruling, underscoring the market's mixed reaction to a deal that, according to regulators, would harm competition and potentially lead to higher prices for consumers.
The Blocked Merger: Details and Reasons The $8.5 billion deal was aimed at creating a formidable U.S.-based luxury conglomerate, bringing together brands like Versace, Michael Kors, and Coach. However, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) raised concerns, arguing that the merger would reduce competition in the accessible luxury handbag segment, where both Capri and Tapestry dominate. Southern District of New York Judge Jennifer Rochon sided with the FTC, granting a preliminary injunction to block the merger on grounds that it could harm consumers by reducing competitive pressure and increasing prices. Henry Liu, the FTC’s Bureau of Competition director, lauded the decision as a “victory” for consumers, emphasizing that continued competition would keep quality high and prices accessible.
Response and Future Steps Capri and Tapestry expressed disappointment and pledged to appeal the ruling. Tapestry argued that the industry remains highly fragmented, with competitive pressure from both established luxury houses and new entrants. The combined entity would still be dwarfed by European luxury titans like LVMH, which recorded over $93 billion in annual sales last year, underscoring how Capri-Tapestry would have remained a relatively modest player globally.
Industry Implications The ruling represents a broader regulatory trend in which agencies like the FTC are scrutinizing mergers more closely, particularly in industries where competition impacts consumer prices. By blocking this deal, the FTC has sent a signal that even in competitive, fragmented markets, large-scale consolidations won’t go unexamined. With Tapestry’s stock now up 34% this year and Capri’s down 55%, the ruling underscores the dynamic, unpredictable nature of the luxury market, and investors will be watching closely as both companies prepare for the appeals process.
The Blocked Merger: Details and Reasons The $8.5 billion deal was aimed at creating a formidable U.S.-based luxury conglomerate, bringing together brands like Versace, Michael Kors, and Coach. However, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) raised concerns, arguing that the merger would reduce competition in the accessible luxury handbag segment, where both Capri and Tapestry dominate. Southern District of New York Judge Jennifer Rochon sided with the FTC, granting a preliminary injunction to block the merger on grounds that it could harm consumers by reducing competitive pressure and increasing prices. Henry Liu, the FTC’s Bureau of Competition director, lauded the decision as a “victory” for consumers, emphasizing that continued competition would keep quality high and prices accessible.
Response and Future Steps Capri and Tapestry expressed disappointment and pledged to appeal the ruling. Tapestry argued that the industry remains highly fragmented, with competitive pressure from both established luxury houses and new entrants. The combined entity would still be dwarfed by European luxury titans like LVMH, which recorded over $93 billion in annual sales last year, underscoring how Capri-Tapestry would have remained a relatively modest player globally.
Industry Implications The ruling represents a broader regulatory trend in which agencies like the FTC are scrutinizing mergers more closely, particularly in industries where competition impacts consumer prices. By blocking this deal, the FTC has sent a signal that even in competitive, fragmented markets, large-scale consolidations won’t go unexamined. With Tapestry’s stock now up 34% this year and Capri’s down 55%, the ruling underscores the dynamic, unpredictable nature of the luxury market, and investors will be watching closely as both companies prepare for the appeals process.